Catella: A Misunderstood Company with an Attractive “Golden Egg” Now Emerging as the Clear Core
A new holding in the fund is Catella – a European asset manager specializing in real estate. In our view, this is a quality company that has undergone years of strategic streamlining, with the final key piece falling into place in early May. At first glance, the company appears complex and still cannot be discovered via standard screening tools such as Börsdata. The stock has long been considered a value case based on the “sum-of-the-parts” (SOTP) approach—valuing each part of the company separately, adding net debt, and comparing the result to the market value. We believe a sensible investment rule is to avoid SOTP cases until the core of the business becomes clearly visible. We believe the May trigger fulfills that criterion, which is why we chose to buy shares in Catella. In short, this is a company with a high share of recurring revenues and a scalable business model that has grown by 18% per year over the past 9 years. We estimate normalized EBIT for this part to be around SEK 300 million, potentially up to SEK 500 million in strong years. In addition to this, the company holds net assets of SEK 1.7 billion. The current market valuation of just under SEK 3 billion implies that the scalable, recurring-revenue business with strong growth history is valued at SEK 1.2 billion—or 4x normalized EBIT. Some of these net assets are currently locked, but the valuation highlights how undervalued the company is as it begins to unlock these values.
Company History and Evolution
Origins and Early Operations
Founded in Sweden in the early 1980s, Catella started as a financial advisory firm. Over the 1990s and 2000s, it grew into a diversified financial group with activities such as:
This created a fragmented structure with geographically and operationally diverse activities.
Strategic Streamlining: From Conglomerate to Focused Real Estate Platform
Phase 1 – Divestments and Restructuring (2014–2018):
Began winding down banking operations due to capital inefficiencies and regulatory burden
Divested or shut down non-core activities
Refocused on real estate advisory and asset management
Phase 2 – Strategic Real Estate Focus (2019–2022):
Clear shift toward becoming a pan-European real estate investment manager
Focused on launching and managing property funds and mandates
Emphasis on logistics, residential, and office properties—often with a sustainability focus
Phase 3 – Capital Partnerships and Investment Platform (2022–)
Structures investments with external capital partners (institutions, family offices, etc.)
Co-invests selectively to align interests
Core strategy is to act as an investment manager, not a property owner
Catella Today: A Specialized Real Estate Platform
A European real estate-focused asset manager with offices in ~10 countries
Operates funds, mandates, and joint ventures
Primarily manages external capital, with some co-investment
Focus on residential, logistics, and urban development projects
Key Trigger: “Kaktus” Project Divestment Reveals the Core
On May 1, Catella announced the sale of the Kaktus real estate project for SEK 2.1 billion, turning 2/3 of Catella’s market cap from a “high-risk mega project” into cash. The sale yielded a SEK 260 million profit, or 10% of the market cap. More importantly, the deal made Catella's balance sheet easier to understand:
Previously appeared overleveraged, masking a net cash position
Interest expenses from Kaktus’ debt were absorbing nearly all EBIT
Core business is a scalable platform with 18% CAGR and sticky, recurring revenues
Even in a weak real estate market, this core has delivered 12% EBIT, compared to 33% at peak (2021–2022). A normalized level is estimated at 23% EBIT margin and SEK 300 million EBIT.
Business Segments: Focus on Investment Management
Catella operates in three segments:
Investment Management (IM)
Corporate Finance (CF)
Principal Investments
Investment Management: Scalable and Recurring
IM has seen 18% AUM growth annually since 2015.

Comprises two areas: 1) Property Funds: earn via rental income and property appreciation, and 2) Property Asset Management: PE-style mandates with multi-year lock-in.
Revenue Structure:
Fixed fees: ~0.6% of AUM
-
Transaction fees: ~0.1–0.3% of AUM
Performance fees: ~0–0.17% of AUM (require “high watermark” returns)
Current AUM revenue yield is 0.68% (2024), with potential to rise to 0.80–0.85% as the market recovers:

Data: Redeye
Normalized margins: EBIT of 22–25% is achievable; peak of 33% already proven. Cost base has been reduced since 2021–2022, increasing scalability.

As the real estate market recovers, transaction revenues are expected to increase immediately. After European transaction volumes dropped to financial crisis levels, Q4 2024 indicated that the transaction market has bottomed out. However, volumes are still far from “normal” levels. See below:

Nevertheless, the funds use a so-called “high watermark principle,” which means that no performance fee is collected until returns reach a new all-time high. Therefore, we believe that performance fees are unlikely before 2027, but transaction fees could help increase revenue generation to 0.80–0.85% of AUM, up from the current level of approximately 0.68% (full-year 2024).
Scalable Business Model with a Normalized ~22–25% EBIT Margin
The business model is scalable, and EBIT margins above 20% should be achievable consistently in a normalized market. In a strong market, the company has already demonstrated an EBIT margin of 33% on a full-year basis, even while operating “sub-scale,” in our opinion. Continued solid growth should lead to strong profit growth as the market recovers.

Data: Redeye
Over the past two years, IM has made several cuts to central functions, resulting in a leaner organization than in 2021–2022. This points to even greater scalability in profitability when the market turns upward.
A large part of Catella’s path to improved profitability lies in its scalable platform, meaning it can take in more assets under management (AUM) without expanding the organization. Fixed costs decreased between 2023 and 2024, while AUM actually increased. This highlights the scalability of the model, and we believe this will become more apparent as the market recovers in the coming years. This forms the basis for improving IM’s minimum profitability. See below for the development of AUM per employee:

Källa: Redeye
In summary, we believe that IM is the true core of Catella and should remain the primary focus. We estimate normalized revenues at present to be around SEK 1.25 billion, with an EBIT margin of approximately 23%, resulting in EBIT of just under SEK 300 million. A clear sign of quality is the company’s ability to maintain stable AUM even during a very weak real estate market. We believe IM can return to healthy growth of around 10% per year, with expanding margins. Given the underlying quality of IM, we consider 15x EBIT to be a reasonable multiple, corresponding to a valuation of SEK 4.5 billion.
Corporate Finance
Corporate Finance (CF) has previously been described by the company as the backbone of Catella. CF involves acting as a strategic advisor in major real estate transactions. Catella can operate on both the sell-side and buy-side, meaning they support both sellers looking to divest and buyers interested in acquiring properties.

The foundation for CF’s success lies in its strong reputation and extensive network among market participants. This means that 1) many know who Catella is, and 2) they recognize Catella's expertise in real estate transactions.
This division is expected to generate approximately SEK 40–50 million in annual EBIT over a full cycle. That is roughly in line with group-wide overhead costs, which is why we consider CF to offset those costs when valuing Catella as a whole. While some synergies exist between CF and IM, we believe CF contributes to the perception of Catella as scattered, which may lead many investors to dismiss the company. Therefore, we believe selling CF would be positive for the stock.
Principal Investments: Real Estate Projects on Catella’s Own Balance Sheet
This segment involves real estate development where Catella itself bears the risk/reward—unlike PF and AM, where risk/reward lies with the client. As of Q4 2024, Catella had nearly SEK 1.5 billion of equity invested, with 49% allocated to the Danish project Kaktus.
After the divestment, approximately SEK 800 million remains invested, spread across seven major projects, each involving SEK 50–200 million. These are valued at cost, despite likely having appreciated in value since initiation.
Going forward, Catella’s strategy is to only undertake co-investments—projects mainly run for clients (as in Asset Management), where Catella invests a small portion of the capital. The aim is to move from a few large projects to many smaller ones, thereby reducing individual project risk and shifting investor attention back to IM..
The Kaktus Divestment: Simpler Balance Sheet and Improved Net Finance
One reason we believe Catella has been undervalued is its difficult-to-read balance sheet. In short, the company appeared to have substantial net debt, when in fact, net cash position (liquid assets minus liabilities) stood at around SEK 1.7 billion. The outstanding bond is split in two: one half matures in fall 2026, the other in spring 2027. Unless repaid early, the company will incur unnecessary interest costs for some time. Assuming no new mega projects are initiated, this will make it much easier for investors to assess how cheap Catella really is.
See below from the Q1 2025 report for an illustration of the post-Kaktus divestment situation:

Provided that no new mega projects are initiated, this should make it easier for investors to see how undervalued Catella is.
Main Owner: Johan Claesson
Johan Claesson, via CA Fastigheter, owns just over 49% of capital and voting rights in Catella. His daughter, Pernilla, owns just over 0.7%, making the Claesson family the majority owner.
Claesson first acquired 27% of Catella in 2008, increased to 39% in 2010, 47% in 2011, and continued small additions up to the current level in 2016.
At 74 years old, Claesson may be looking to scale down his involvement. He is known to be highly hands-on with everything he owns, including Catella, where he was Chairman until spring 2024. There’s speculation about a potential sale, though we believe he may wait for an improved property market and stronger earnings before considering such a move. Regardless, Claesson will determine the future path for Catella, including the use of proceeds from the Kaktus sale.
Full Acquisition a Possibility
Beyond Claesson potentially being open to a sale in the coming years, many credible buyers exist. The private equity (PE) industry is consolidating, with many major players acquiring real estate firms—e.g., EQT’s acquisition of Exeter in 2021. Catella would be a prime target for a mid-sized U.S. firm lacking a European platform, or a European public/buyout firm wanting to enter real estate.
Consolidation is driven by economies of scale and cross-selling opportunities with existing investors.
Capital Allocation – The Million Dollar Question
Following the Kaktus sale and its debt repayment, Catella now has more than SEK 1.7 billion in cash. Bond repayments of around SEK 650 million are due in fall 2026 and spring 2027, leaving at least SEK 400 million in surplus liquidity—not counting potential additional project exits.
Key options:
Special dividend
Share buybacks
Co-investments
-
Acquisitions within IM
Special dividend: SEK 400 million corresponds to just over SEK 4 per share. The fact that Claesson may want to partially exit Catella suggests that part of the surplus liquidity could be used for this. It also makes sense if the intention is to eventually sell the entire company. Regarding the ability to pay a dividend, the company has two conditions tied to its bonds. One is that at least SEK 200 million must be held in liquid assets, which is covered through an unused credit facility of the same amount. The other is that the company must maintain equity exceeding SEK 1 billion, which is already comfortably met.
Share buybacks: The stock is cheap relative to its underlying value, which the board is well aware of. Many larger shareholders have been pushing for this option for some time. The obstacle is that Claesson (via CA Fastigheter) would then surpass 50% of the outstanding shares, which would require Catella to be consolidated into CA Fastigheter’s financial statements. Therefore, Claesson would likely need to sell a corresponding portion of his stake if buybacks are to proceed.
Co-investments: The stated strategy for Principal Investments is to carry out multiple co-investments while simultaneously increasing AUM. However, they are unlikely to rush into so many projects that it would consume all liquidity. The maximum investment from Catella is EUR 15 million per project, typically representing at least 5% of the total capital invested in the asset.
Acquisitions within IM: Detta har tidigare gjorts och är även sannolikt framgent. IM är idag starkt positionerade mot det segment som kallas ”Core residential”, dvs investering i stabila bostadsfastigheter i attraktiva lägen med långa uthyrningar, låg vakans och förutsägbart kassaflöde. Fokus ligger på stabilitet snarare än maximal avkastning. Då denna typ har ett typisk avkastningsmål på 4-6 eller 4-7% så är denna typ mycket attraktiv i en lågräntemiljö, men mindre attraktiv när räntor blivit högre. Detta gör att IM sannolikt inte kan växa lika starkt som historiskt i dagens räntemiljö.
Instead, Catella wants to focus on “value add” and “opportunistic” strategies. A value add strategy involves investing in properties with potential for improvement, often through active management, renovation, or tenant restructuring. An opportunistic strategy involves taking on high-risk, high-return properties—typically through development projects, conversions, or turnarounds.
Since “value add” and “opportunistic” strategies aim for higher returns, they are better suited for high interest rate environments. Therefore, we believe that one or more acquisitions may fall into one of these categories—or both. This strategy could also potentially command a higher fee structure compared to existing funds.
Summary and Outlook
In summary, Investment Management (IM) is the true golden egg within Catella, and we hope this is where the company will increasingly focus now that the Kaktus project has been sold. Even though we don’t assume or expect it, it would likely be positive for the share price if the Corporate Finance division were also divested. That way, the full focus would shift to IM, which should be able to grow AUM by 5% over the next two years, and then return to 10% annual growth with scalable profitability.
We are also hoping for both a special dividend and share buybacks.
Finally, the company rests on a foundation of approximately SEK 19 per share in net assets. In addition, Investment Management is expected to generate normalized EBIT of at least SEK 300 million (SEK 3.4 per share), meaning the market is currently valuing this part at around 4x EBIT, while we believe a multiple of 13–18x EBIT would be more reasonable.
We believe Catella is a case that aligns well with what Monish Pabrai so wisely expressed: “If we as investors fixate and overdose on downside protection, the upside, in many cases, takes care of itself.”.
Catella represents 2.4% of Quality Focus..